[GEM-dev] valid FSAA levels
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Tue Mar 24 18:12:50 CET 2009
Then what about [FSAA 3(, [FSAA -1(, etc. I think a warning wouldn't
hurt, you could add in 5 as a supported value.
Another option is to have a [antialiasing 0/1( message with just gives
a default AA level for people who don't want to think about it.
.hc
On Mar 24, 2009, at 3:47 AM, cyrille henry wrote:
> hello,
>
> after few month without antialiasing, i realized that this as
> changed on new nvidia driver.
> FSAA 4 is no more valid. you should use FSAA 5 for the same effect
> (really can't understand nvidia logic).
>
> So, no check / no warning is the best.
> C
>
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
>> I am documenting the FSAA message to the [gemwin]. It seems to me
>> that it only takes the values 0,2,4,8. There is a check in the C++
>> code, but its currently a little bit useless:
>> void gemwin :: fsaaMess(int value)
>> {
>> if (value == 2 || value == 4 || value == 8){
>> GemMan :: fsaa = value;
>> }
>> else{
>> GemMan :: fsaa = value;
>> }
>> }
>> It seems to me that it should issue a warning if 'value' is not a
>> useful value. Also, [FSAA 0( would be an intuitive way to turn off
>> FSAA, it seems to work.
>> .hc
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I
>> have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have
>> three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their
>> minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. -
>> Martin Luther King, Jr.
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be
glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and
this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list