[GEM-dev] performance to share texture

[cyrille henry]

Jack a écrit :
> 
> Le 24 juin 09 à 16:22, cyrille henry a écrit :
> 
>>
>> hello,
>>
>> i think gem load an image only when sending a load message to 
>> pix_image, so your 2 exemples should be the same.
> OK, thanx for clarifications. I have forgotten that :)
>>
>> by why do you use initbang when a loadbang is ok?
>> where does initbang comes from?
> Because it is an abstraction loaded dynamically.
yep, i got it now.
here what i usually do with vanilla objects only.
c

> ++
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
>>
>> c
>>
>> Jack a écrit :
>>> Here an abstraction where there is two possibilities.
>>> There is some comments inside.
>>> I would like to know if i am right about performance ?
>>> It is what we were talking about Cyrille ?
>>> Thanx a lot.
>>> ++
>>> Jack
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Archive.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 994 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20090624/d4209a6e/attachment.zip>