[GEM-dev] performance to share texture

Jack jack at rybn.org
Wed Jun 24 17:11:22 CEST 2009


Good,
I used to use something like :

[3 (
|
[t b f]
|    |
|    ...
|
[bang(
|
[s banginit] (and a [r banginit] in abstractions.

and not the [loadbang( message. I have to use this method, right now.

No chance to have [initbang] in Vanilla ?
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-05/070353.html
++

Jack


Le 24 juin 09 à 16:53, cyrille henry a écrit :

>
>
> Jack a écrit :
>> Le 24 juin 09 à 16:22, cyrille henry a écrit :
>>>
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> i think gem load an image only when sending a load message to  
>>> pix_image, so your 2 exemples should be the same.
>> OK, thanx for clarifications. I have forgotten that :)
>>>
>>> by why do you use initbang when a loadbang is ok?
>>> where does initbang comes from?
>> Because it is an abstraction loaded dynamically.
> yep, i got it now.
> here what i usually do with vanilla objects only.
> c
>
>> ++
>> Jack
>>>
>>> c
>>>
>>> Jack a écrit :
>>>> Here an abstraction where there is two possibilities.
>>>> There is some comments inside.
>>>> I would like to know if i am right about performance ?
>>>> It is what we were talking about Cyrille ?
>>>> Thanx a lot.
>>>> ++
>>>> Jack
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> -----
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev<Archive.zip>





More information about the GEM-dev mailing list