[GEM-dev] deprecated ?

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

On 2010-04-05 08:09, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>> or is it working ?
>> i'm confused.
> 
> Had compiled with wrong headers. Ended up doing this :
> 
> struct GemState92 {
>   int dirty, inDisplayList, lighting, smooth, texture; pixBlock *image;
>   GemState92(); ~GemState92(); void reset();
> };
> struct GemState93 {
>   bool dirty, inDisplayList, lighting, smooth; int texture; pixBlock
> *image;
>   GemState93(); ~GemState93(); void reset(); virtual void your_mom() = 0;
> };
> ...
>     void render(void *state) {
>         if (gem>=93) ((GemState93 *)state)->image = &m_pixBlock;
>         else         ((GemState92 *)state)->image = &m_pixBlock;
>     }
> etc
> 
> therefore I can support both with a single build.
> 

the idea is to drop all those public members and make them available via
a get/set system, so new member variables can be introduced without
breaking binary compatibility (and without having an ever-growing header
file)
it's not there yet.

hopefully it will be there for 0.93

gmadr
IOhannes

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20100406/29bff0bd/attachment.bin>