[GEM-dev] examples 08 and 09 of 10.glsl

[cyrille henry]

hello,

the only explanation i can find is that this Gem version was not compile with the good openGL header.
but i'm not a specialist.

i think (hope) that recompiling will solve your problem.

the Gem version provided by pd extended never worked for me.

Cyrille


erich a écrit :
> hi cyrille,
> 
>> what Gem version are you using?
> 
> Pd version 0.42.5-extended-20100116
> 
> with
> 
> GEM: ver: 0.92.2 
> GEM: compiled: Jan 16 2010
> 
>> can you try to compile the curent svn version?
> 
> yes but not instantly, i might need some time
> 
>> are they working like they used to (exept for the CPU used)?
> 
> yes they work, except not accelerated with high cpu consumption
> 
> erich
> 
> 
>> c
>>
>> erich a écrit :
>>> hello,
>>>
>>> walking through the examples of 10.glsl (0.92.3) i noticed that
>>> 08 and 09 stopped working for me, meaning the consume so much 
>>> cpu that they hardly perform anymore (esp. 09)
>>>
>>> i cant remember the exact time anymore but on the same machine 
>>> they have been working without problems over half a year ago. 
>>>
>>> it seems what was hw-accelerated back then is not anymore.
>>>
>>> any idea what could be the reason ?
>>>
>>> i run ubuntu 9.10
>>> card: Quadro FX Go1400
>>> NVIDIA Driver Version: 185.18.36
>>>
>>> it might have stopped working after upgrading to 9.10
>>> but this is only a guess now.
>>>
>>> otherwise i can see no performance issue 
>>>
>>> best
>>>
>>> erich
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>
> 
> 
>