[GEM-dev] Gem fixes in Pd-extended
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Jun 28 10:17:01 CEST 2010
On 2010-06-25 20:39, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I'd like to include Max's updated help patches in this Pd-extended.
> Should I commit them to the Gem/0.92 branch or import the Gem 0.92
> source into pure-data SVN and commit there?
>
there is absolutely no cause for alarm [1]
i believe that most "patches" in the patch-tracker make it into Gem
pretty soon (probably not within hours; but mostly within days).
if they fix bugs, they usually make into the last stable release (in
this case branches/0.92) as well)
mfgasdr
IOhannes
[1] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVWCEKDDI-E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20100628/c6e1d46a/attachment.bin>
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list