[GEM-dev] weirdeness

IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Feb 14 12:36:36 CET 2011


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2011-02-14 12:06, cyrille henry wrote:
> 
> 
> is it normal that every pix_blablabla object get instancied as a
> pix_freeframe object?

yes this is normal.
FreeFrame (and frei0r) also register loaders, so you can instantiate
these effects as [pix_<pluginname>].

> (with a "error: GemException: couldn't find 'blablabla'.''")

could be that i increased verbosity with one of the last commits, so you
actually notice that freeframe is involved (as opposed to the object
simply failing to create)

just to make sure: freeframe/frei0r loaders should only take effect if
there is actually such a plugin.
e.g. if you create [pix_blabla] and there is no FreeFrame plugin named
"blabla" but there is an abstraction pix_blabla.pd in your path, you
should still end up with the abstraction.

fg
asdrm
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZE8QACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRjAQCgnI6g9PAF1BO8bOyImNY0zAgD
v7gAoMlGvxC6mL6WXYhQGrW1lxvxuRTq
=etwb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20110214/f56a1d96/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the GEM-dev mailing list