[GEM-dev] weirdeness
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Feb 14 20:06:20 CET 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/2011 06:58 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> Do you really think that it's a good idea to use a loader in this manner ?
yes.
the idea is to make 3rd party plugins integrate seamlessly into Gem.
>
> What is the possibility of nameclashes here ?
>
obviously it's there.
e.g. there is a frei0r plugin called "multiply", which could be accessed
as [pix_multiply].
since [pix_multiply] is already built into Gem, you will never get the
frei0r plugin this way, you have to explicitely use
[pix_frei0r multiply]
(btw, [pix_frei0r multiply] won't do either, simply because this plugin
is a mixer, which is currently unsupported by Gem's frei0r implementation)
fgmadr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk1ZfSsACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvT9MQCeOL1G4qrIspoYoGNt6yO/buXl
eu8AoI0Zkssel5dVMk98EGsxY3CbFZYH
=S1HC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list