[GEM-dev] question regarding closing a DC1394 device

[cyrille henry]

Le 04/04/2011 19:17, IOhannes zmölnig a écrit :
> On 04/04/2011 06:56 PM, cyrille henry wrote:
>> hello,
>>
>> after removing a pix_video object that is connected to a dc1394 device
>> (or closing pd), the device is still sending information.
>> (so you have to reboot it if you want to connect it again)
>>
>> i don't really understand the code of videoDC1394.cpp.
>> line 59 : what is this close() function?
>
> without looking at the code:
> close() is the public (as used by pix_video) function (as defined in video.cpp), that in turn calls stopTransfer() (if needed) and closeDevice() (if needed)
> at least, it _should_ do that.
> if it does not, then there is a bug somewhere...
yes, there is a bug somwhere, and i don't have a DC1394 camera with me to test...

>
>>
>> i think closeDevice need to be add line 60. It help to stop transfer
>> function when removing the object, but strangely it did not help when
>> closing pd.
>> So i did not really know if it's the way to go.
>
> there is a bug in Pd that does not call the object's destructors/closefunctions when quitting Pd.
> i once tried a fix but it was not accepted (i think thomas grill spotted some problems with my fix)
ok.

thanks
Cyrille

>
> fgamrsd
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>