[GEM-dev] [ pd-gem-Bugs-3292038 ] pix_snap: what does "work best" mean

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Tue May 10 12:20:09 CEST 2011


Bugs item #3292038, was opened at 2011-04-23 15:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507079&aid=3292038&group_id=64325

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: documentation
Group: any operating system
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Matteo Sisti Sette (sistisette)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: pix_snap: what does "work best" mean

Initial Comment:
The help patch for pix_snap says: "pix_snap works best with single buffered windows". What does it mean? What are exactly its limitations or known issues with double buffered windows?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot)
Date: 2011-05-10 10:20

Message:
This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was
previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter
did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by
the administrator of this Tracker).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmlnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-04-26 10:15

Message:
thanks for your bug-report.
it seems that you have already found out what "best" means: in single
buffered mode, the buffer you are snapping usually has already some
content, whereas in double-buffered mode it is mostly empty (unless you
just draw something to it).

therefore i tag this issue as "duplicate", as it is basically the same as
#3292406 (though from a different pov)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507079&aid=3292038&group_id=64325



More information about the GEM-dev mailing list