[GEM-dev] I can't see Gem window when I create it

[Jack]

Le 02/09/2011 11:14, Jack a écrit :
> Le 01/09/2011 19:51, ch at chnry.net a écrit :
>> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:47:18 +0200, Jack wrote:
>>> I wanted to say, this happen when the Gem window is created and 
>>> visible.
>> do you really have 0fps, or is it a buf from this abstration?
>>
>>>>
>>>>> go to 50 the second time and go to 20 or 25 the
>>>>> third time.
>>>> after a reset, gem goes to default 20fps.
>>>> so, it's normal (unless you send frame 50 after the reset).
>>> Yep true.
>>> But I tried without the reset and the framerate goes between 20 and 
>>> 50 !
>>> i will investigate more further.
>> did you render anything at this time?
> Yes, i did.
> I am back in the room where there is the installation.
> If the bahavior is different today, i will keep you informed.
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>> c
>>
>>
>>> Thanx.
>>> ++
>>>
>>> Jack
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ++
>>>> c
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm gonna to be crazy ! :)
>>>>> ++
>>>>>
>>>>> Jack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GEM-dev mailing list
>>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GEM-dev mailing list
>> GEM-dev at iem.at
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
It seems it is OK today. i get the good framerate.
But i still get the problem with 'border 0'.
With the window manager 'sawfish' (with 'border 1' to gewmin), i can 
remove the title bar.
I don't know if it is a good choice (is it better to have a gemwin with 
'border 0' than 'border 1' in term of performance ?).
Thanx.
++

Jack