[GEM-dev] using logpost(3) for version message
IOhannes m zmölnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Thu Sep 29 08:59:54 CEST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/28/2011 03:05 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Ah, I see. Are there any runtime tests for the Pd version in Gem?
how it that supposed to help?
> I'm perfectly happy if you want to use verbose() instead of logpost().
> I didn't use it because I can't remember what level it posts at, there
> is something about +4.
so you are saying that there is a loglevel between post() and
verbose(0)? how come?
fgmasdr
IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk6EF2YACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTsAACg4pokdmaPXBlLUeH0Mlx3PK5k
NLcAn0rJysYYVnLav2XlpY326XMnNLxl
=HvAO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the GEM-dev
mailing list