[GEM-dev] problem with [pix_mask]

[Max]

I have the same problem.
i didn't find anything about it in the bugtracker, shall i file a bug or is this a feature?
m.

Am 21.05.2010 um 16:30 schrieb Jack:

> Hello,
> 
> Is it normal that i get transparency when i use [pix_mask] in my
> example. It seems the white pixels from dancer.JPG are not enough white.
> Even with [pix_duotone] on dancer.JPG to get a white (1,1,1) and a black
> (0,0,0), it is still the same.
> Any idea to avoid this problem ?
> ++
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> 
> <pix_mask-help.pd>_______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20111108/224d9ec6/attachment.pgp>