[GEM-dev] [ pd-gem-Patches-3414731 ] when building for 0.43, use new verbose() for version post

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Sun Feb 12 18:27:18 CET 2012


Patches item #3414731, was opened at 2011-09-27 15:05
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507081&aid=3414731&group_id=64325

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: C/C++ code
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: when building for 0.43, use new verbose()  for version post

Initial Comment:
Following up on this thread:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/2011-09/005426.html

This patch uses logpost() on pd >= 0.43 to post to the version message, so that version messages are only visible at the '3 debug' level, not the '2 normal' level.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-11-17 07:36

Message:
it reduces clutter of the pd-console and thus might improve user
experience.
it doesn't eliminate any malfunctioning.

therefore, imho this is a new feature, unless you think that every missing
feature is automatically a bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Date: 2011-11-17 06:46

Message:
IMHO, this is a bugfix.  It'll be in Pd-extended either way, but this would
cut down on differences.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-11-17 00:35

Message:
no.

0.93 will only get bugfixes, no additional features.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Date: 2011-11-16 21:26

Message:
Any chance of getting this patch included in the 0.93 branch?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-10-24 10:41

Message:
my platform: debian/sid (i368)

"the patch does not compile" of course means, that Gem fails to build with
your patch applied.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: IOhannes m zmölnig (zmoelnig)
Date: 2011-10-24 10:39

Message:
unfortunately this patch does not compile

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave)
Date: 2011-09-28 10:17

Message:
I updated this patch to use verbose(-1) to achieve the same thing while
remaining binary compatibile with 0.42 and 0.41.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=507081&aid=3414731&group_id=64325



More information about the GEM-dev mailing list