[GEM-dev] pix_set new features

[Antoine Villeret]

ok you're the boss :-)

about the pix_set, i had a fill method which doesn't care about the ROI
should it ?

+
a
--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
http://drii.ensad.fr
--
Google lit ce mail...
si vous refusez cela, utilisez l'adresse antoine.villeret [at] free.fr
pour me contacter


2012/12/11 IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
> On 12/11/2012 19:24, Antoine Villeret wrote:
>>
>> and what about the opposite ?
>> stay in discrete coordinate in the code and add a normalized message ?
>> in that way the conversion is done only once (when the ROI is set in
>> normalized coord) and not each time we set the data (for pix_set)
>> maybe i'm going wrong...
>
>
> i'd rather not.
> the way it is now, [pix_roi] is independent of the actual pixes.
> i very much like it that way.
>
> one could provide helper-functions to easily convert a given ROI/pix to
> absolute coordinates on the C++ layer, if you care about the programming
> overhead.
> the computational overhead is small enough.
>
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev