[GEM-dev] pix_write \ pix_image

[Фывапр Олджэвич]

 and what do you think about the quality of the images (the "old-tv effect") ? can it be fixed ? 

tnx

Пятница, 14 июня 2013, 21:13 +02:00 от IOhannes zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>:
>On 06/14/2013 08:20 PM, Фывапр Олджэвич wrote:
>>
>> 2) also with the [makefilename] thing i can't make names like "test00001.jpg" because the [test0000%d.jpg] after 10 will provide names like "test000017.jpg" but not "test00017.jpg" (i mean it keeps the number of zeroes)..
>> and the [test%5d.jpg] somehow provides names with spaces, not zeroes.. it look like "test     1.jpg" .
>> regarding that i can't really change names while saving the images with [pix_writer] or [pix_write] - the slideshow is finished at the 10th slide..
>>
>> can you advice what to do ?
>
>ah, should have been "%05d"
>
>>
>> 3) abstractions/pix_writer.pd
>>
>> - where can i look it ? didn't find in pd folder such directory ..
>
>if it's not in your installation, check in the repository, e.g. on 
>github or on sourceforge.
>
>>
>> == my system is : PC \ Windows 7 Home \ Core i7 \ 6 GB \ Nvidia GT 650M 2 G \ Pd-extended 42.5 \ GEM 0.92.3
>
>probably you should upgrade to Gem-0.93.
>
>usually newer releases fix a number of bugs.
>
>
>gsamdr
>IOhannes


-- 
Максим Иванов
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20130615/524eb633/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 144828 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20130615/524eb633/attachment-0001.jpeg>