[GEM-dev] help with glsl abstractions

[Jack]

Le 30/08/2013 01:51, Antoine Villeret a écrit :
> good job !
> could be very useful !
> I have some too (to replace pix_movement for example)
> what is your working repo ?
>
> +
> a
>
> --
> do it yourself                     
> http://antoine.villeret.free.fr
>
>
> 2013/8/28 Jack <jack at rybn.org <mailto:jack at rybn.org>>
>
>
> Le 26/07/2013 14:03, IOhannes m zmölnig a écrit :
> > On 07/26/13 11:44, Jack wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I would like to create GLSL abstractions in the help directory, which
> >> would replace pix_ objects when possible. The name would start with
> >> glsl_ instead of pix_.
>
> > sound good.
>
> >> Is there any objection against this ?
>
> > no.
>
> >> If not, i would like to have acces to the git repository with write
> >> access. Is that possible ?
>
> > wouldn't it be easier if you just forked the repository, and made a
> > pull-request via github?
> > i really love the decentralized aspect of git.
>
>
> > mgfd.gasda
> > IOhannes
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > GEM-dev mailing list
> > GEM-dev at iem.at <mailto:GEM-dev at iem.at>
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
> I started to make seven abstractions glsl_*.
> I would like to be sure, with the example attached, if i am on the
> right path.
> Comments are welcome.
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>

So I create an account on Github where I fork Gem.
I don't know if i do it according to the rules. Tell me if I have to
change something.
git://github.com/Jackovic/Gem.git
I put a 'glsl_abstractions' directory in the 'help' and don't know if it
is the best place for that.
++

Jack


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20130901/1183d704/attachment.htm>