[GEM-dev] Building Gem with MinGW

[Antoine Villeret]

hello,

sorry no news, I didn't work again on this since September

but I do have a working gem.dll from Visual C++ which seems to work
but it's on a machine at home and I'm far from it now...
i can send it to you for testing if you want
and i can even make it available to the community if it sounds a good idea
for most of you...

I will be back at home in one week

best

a


--
do it yourself
http://antoine.villeret.free.fr


2013/10/16 Nicolas Montgermont <nicolas_montgermont at yahoo.fr>

>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello antoine,
>
> Do you have any news for this?
> Do you have a binary accompanied with dll we can test?
> thanks,
> best,
> n
>
> Le 12/09/13 16:30, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> > On 2013-09-12 16:24, Antoine Villeret wrote:
> > > hi,
> >
> > > I found a workaround by putting the allocation in a #ifndef _WIN32
> > > statement pthread_t is a structure under windows and  not only a
> > > 64bit int.
> >
> > > with pd-vanilla I got :
> > >
> "C:\\MinGW\\msys\\1.0\\home\\antoine\\pd\\pd-vanilla\\extra\\Gem\\Gem.dll:
> >
> >
> >
> > couldn't load
> > > Gem: can't load library"
> >
> > > on startup... maybe because pd was build using microsoft compiler
> > > and Gem with MinGW
> >
> > no, this shouldn't be a problem.
> > C-binaries are compatible between different compilers, C++-binaries
> > are not.
> > Pd only has a C-interface, so there shouldn't be a problem.
> > otoh, Gem's plugins are all C++, that's the reason why Direct*-plugins
> > don't work with a mingw build.
> >
> >
> > > I also managed to produce a Gem.dll form Microsoft Visual C++ 2010
> > > Express and this time Gem loads in pd-vanilla 0.45.2
> >
> > > and it seems to work !
> >
> > cool.
> >
> >
> > > but i am wondering if i am doing right : Gem claims that some dll
> > > are missing and I added them directly to the Windows\System32
> > > folder should I include them in the Visual Project instead ?
> >
> > you should be able to put them besides Gem.dll.
> > if that doesn't work, put them besides pd.exe.
> > Windows\System32 is a *bad* place.
> >
> > fgvmadsr
> > IOhannes
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GEM-dev mailing list
> > GEM-dev at iem.at
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> >
>
>
> - --
> http://www.nimon.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlJe0i4ACgkQyQxFEQ9xedOtBACfdCuTWXOcqH9TX64grOhW76S9
> fsAAnjzfElqTBJHMaXYfTvikOtJirjyH
> =VowC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20131016/b7f99d26/attachment.htm>