[GEM-dev] gemwin

[Cyrille Henry]

Le 20/08/2014 11:16, Nicolas Montgermont a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> Le 20/08/2014 10:07, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>> conclusion:
>> add abstractions/ to your path, so you have a proper [gemwin].
>>
> IMHO, these abstractions should stand in the same path as the other
> objects (ie next to the Gem.pd_xx)
i agree, the make install should copy them.
c



>  From the user point of view there is no difference between object that
> are externals from the lib and objects that are abstractions that rely
> on externals from the lib.
> Atm, the abstractions achieve functionality that are really close to
> other objects from gem, or even that used to be objects in Gem.
>
> It means the compatiblity is broken just because of the displacements of
> these objects in a new path ( ./abstractions)
>
> Moreover, the management of path/lib is now cleaner directly in the
> patch with [declare], it means someone has to [declare -lib Gem -path
> Gem/abstractions] to get them, and as they cover the mandatory functions
> of Gem (gemhead, gemwin) it makes the import of the library more complex
> all the time.
>
> If possible Gem should work with [declare -lib Gem], is there a proper
> way to do that?
>
> Best,
>
> Nicolas
>