[GEM-dev] get strange value from pix_snap/pix_grey/pix_dump

Jack jack at rybn.org
Fri Mar 10 12:12:17 CET 2017


Super it works now !
Thank you !
++

Jack



Le 10/03/2017 à 07:14, zmoelnig at iem.at a écrit :
> On 03/09/2017 10:38 PM, zmoelnig at iem.at wrote:
>>> Le 09/03/2017 à 12:02, Jack a écrit :
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to capture a framebuffer (colors are only black and white)
>>>> with [pix_snap] and analyse it with [pix_dump]. So i use [pix_grey] to
>>>> send only grey values to [pix_dump], but i get a weird result.
>>>> See small patch attached grabing the default black window.
>>>> Is it a bug or the expected behavior of these objects ?
>>>> ++
>>> GEM: ver: 0.93.git cb323f8
>>
>> interesting.
>> it works as expected with Gem-0.92
>>
>> i'll try to investigate...
>>
> 
> fixed in git.
> someone boggled precedences of pointer dereferencing and addition...
> 
> gfards
> IOhannes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> GEM-dev at lists.iem.at
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
> 


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev/attachments/20170310/b0e72701/attachment.sig>


More information about the GEM-dev mailing list