[PD-announce] [PD] pmpd v 0.10

[Jack]

It would be nice to have a second outlet on [pmpd], [pmpd2d] and
[pmpd3d] like on MSD objects.
The 54_pmpd_wave.pd example doesn't work here.
[pmpd] seems to have a problem.
Do test and interaction objects work with [pmpd], [pmpd2d] and [pmpd3d]
masses ?
++

Jack



Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 19:04 +0100, cyrille henry a écrit :
> hello,
> i've made a new pmpd version.
> There is 3 new objects : pmpd, pmpd2d and pmpd3d.
> this 3 objects should replace MSD. most of the time, they are compatible.
> there is few differences anyway :
> - few messages get renamed (both on input or output)
> - there is a difference on the calculation of tLink Damping
> - there is now a damping associate with each masses
> - there are more messages to get simulation data
> 
> I encourage anyone to switch from MSD to pmpd, since MSD will not be maintained.
> 
> help / examples / sources can be found on pd svn.
> 
> Cyrille
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-announce mailing list
> Pd-announce at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-announce/attachments/20110228/61e76051/attachment.pgp>