[PD-dev] even more confusion?
dieb13 at klingt.org
Mon Sep 9 13:13:55 CEST 2002
i personally would not know what to change/add to the pd-core sources,
but i thinks it's a very good idea to have this cvs-repository as a
platform for tests and experiments. there needs to be a way to deal with
the incresing number of people, who want to participate in this project.
i always understood the the cvs that way, and never thought it
would/could replace millers distribution.
[X] pro cvs
> About changing the core of pd behind Millers back:
> This was definitely not my intention, I rather tried to setup a repository
> for those who like to send patches to Miller, in order to have the
> possibility to test them, select those that fit and throw away those who
> are useless.
> Finally Miller will have the say what he accepts for pd and what not.
> I think it is very important to make development for pd as open as
> possible, same for GEM. I am just trying to propose a "procedure" how
> to contribute to pd, because I think that several contributions may get
> lost because there is not an official way to do so.
> We had several discussions about how to do that, and in order not to
> increase the load upon Miller I did it this way, maybe there are better
> ways ..., or maybe its a bad idea in general.
> What do you think ?
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.kug.ac.at
More information about the Pd-dev