[PD-dev] Gem CVS Bug (wrong alarm ??)

[Daniel Heckenberg]

Does anyone have a good scheme for achieving GEM rendering in a separate
thread without:
 - too much recoding
 - too much synchronisation overhead
 - losing expected PD object behaviour
?

I've thought about it a little and haven't figured out an elegant scheme
yet.  Certainly keeping the rendering in a separate thread looks like it
would make things easier.

Daniel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pd-dev-admin at iem.kug.ac.at [mailto:pd-dev-admin at iem.kug.ac.at]On
> Behalf Of guenter geiger
> Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2002 6:45 AM
> To: IOhannes zmoelnig
> Cc: Daniel Heckenberg; chris clepper; PD-dev at iem.kug.ac.at
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Gem CVS Bug (wrong alarm ??)
>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, IOhannes zmoelnig wrote:
> > i see daniel's suggestion of making Gem a second thread, but this would
> > have been easier with the hardwired DAG
>
> Exactly what I thought too, when I read that proposal, but it would
> be great having both.
>
> Guetner
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.kug.ac.at
> http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
>