[PD-dev] [GEM] cvs update *.*
chris clepper
cclepper at artic.edu
Fri Mar 7 20:28:41 CET 2003
>hi GEMers !
>
>last night i have updated some files in the Gem-CVS and had no time
>for sending out a mail ... sorry, here it goes:
<snip>
>3. [separator]
>hopefully i have fixed the bug that kept it crashing when it was
>used with images.
as you note in the source, there is now a memory leak in the
separator object. i have yet to figure out what the problem is, but
calling free on that pointer should cause a warning not a crash (it
doesn't segfault on OSX). maybe a linux bug??
>4.[pix_buf]
>hopefully fixed the bug that kept it crashing when it was used with images.
>[pix_buf] will store image-data into a separate buffer. all pix_
>objects below [pix_buf] will have access to the buffered data
>instead of the original one.
>5. [pix_crop]
>i thought i had checked this in long ago (but obviously had not, and
>now i have found the original code again)
>it takes sub-images of images (withan offset x/y pair and a dimen w/h pair)
i was thinking of making an object that combined both of these
functions so one could 'cut up' and image and process each part
differently. maybe it would be called [pix_split] or [pix_cut(up)]
or [pix_slice]? basically the user would send messages selecting the
area to output and a for loop would move the pixels around. it would
be nice to have N number of outlets for this object, but i'm not sure
how possible that it with GEM.
i have also written a mode of processing called processSubImage()
that only processes a user specified area of the image. it's
probably not practical to add this to each and every object so maybe
[pix_split] is a better way to go....
>6. what else ?
>a minor configure-script update
>+ "cannot remember"
there were some updates to GemBase with the ultra-informative log
entry of '???'. what happened there?
cgc
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list