SF or IEM CVS? (WAS: Re: [PD-dev] cvs-commit list)
geiger at xdv.org
Mon Oct 6 18:37:51 CEST 2003
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > At 07:37 PM 2/10/2003, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >> probably we could migrate the CVS from sourceforge to iem
> >> (medium-term or long-term), which might be faster on the long run
> >> (but of course we cannot offer a compile farm)
> > I see this as a good thing, as IIRC, SourceForge's CVS for anonymous
> > access is 24 hours behind what it should be.
> They are in the middle of a big upgrade, so I think that their CVS
> service will get much better. They are adding 6 new servers, starting
> from the original 2. They already have two new ones in place and I
> think that the CVS service has gotten noticably better. So I think we
> stick it out with SF for a bit longer.
> But there is something nice about having everything in one place.
The strongest argument to have it on a private server is that it would
be easier to rearrange it there, IMO.
(removing old directories and adjusting the structure).
More information about the Pd-dev