[PD-dev] Making a Video/Graphics friendly Pd.app for MacOS X

Mathieu Bouchard matju at sympatico.ca
Sat Jun 19 10:18:32 CEST 2004

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

>     (This also makes automation much easier.  It looks like
> PDP/PIDIP/GEM2PDP are already there, I don't know where GridFlow is
> and ideally Gem could be moved back to the Pd CVS since it only really
> works with Pd anyway)

I had to reinstall GridFlow's CVS for some reason and I'm not finished
yet. I'll mirror GridFlow to Pd's CVS whenever I release version 0.7.7.

> For the long run, it would be ideal if all of the objects in the video
> libs were compiled as individual files.  This makes it much easier for
> newbies since they you don't have to deal with the .pdrc at all, plus
> it makes handling name conflicts much easier (there are some in Gem
> for example).

I reiterate that this is not possible with GridFlow, as it all goes thru
something that we could call "rubyext" (that's all gridflow.pd_linux is,
after all)

Mathieu Bouchard                       http://artengine.ca/matju

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list