[PD-dev] an idea for Pd structure

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

That was discussed at pd~conf.  I think Miller is going to include  
[prepend] soon.

.hc

On Oct 15, 2004, at 1:31 PM, B. Bogart wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On the note of using Pd message in this way...
>
> how about a standard "prepend" internal? :)
>
> B.
>
> guenter geiger wrote:
> | On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> |
> |>I would generally have no problem with replacing the OSC-messages for
> |>rrad-internal messages with lists.
> |>
> |>But I would need to solve another thing: The fact, that OSC message
> |>targets are just a single atom in Pd, and not a list, while they  
> still
> |>can describe hierarchies of e.g. abstractions.
> |>
> |>This is very useful, if you want to "pack" lists into abstraction
> |>arguments. $1 in OSC lingo can be "/myabs/synths/fm/carrier" whereas
> |>[route]-lingo would need $1-4 for the same: "myabs synths fm  
> carrier".
> |>
> |>Now someone might suggest to pack the 4-element list with something
> |>like "list2symbol" in advance. But in fact that only brings us back  
> to
> |>OSC formatted messages. ;)
> |
> |
> | .. and it would be a terribly ugly solution too.
> |
> | Mhmm,
> |
> | Guenter
> |
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | PD-dev mailing list
> | PD-dev at iem.at
> | http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
> |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBcAlvjbOsMZSA25cRAstZAKC+VrJ4lY0Hsb/2V7d6OE/qlH4EgQCeP8Md
> Lsq+5cnZL/k0MlVSbzHdFyc=
> =N7s3
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev
>

________________________________________________________________________ 
____

"Information wants to be free."
                              -Stewart Brand