garrays in dsp (was Re: [PD-dev] re: branch convergence)
Tim Blechmann
TimBlechmann at gmx.net
Mon Nov 29 01:21:48 CET 2004
> Well, it might be simpler to store a pointer to the t_array instead of
> one to the actual vector (a_vec) in the DSP routines. That way,
yes, but it would break the compatibility with garray_getfloatarray
> resizing or swapping vectors could happen without re-sorting DSP, but
> you'd still have to re-sort ig a "t_garray" got deleted or renamed.
hm ... i haven't checked, what happens if a t_garray will be renamed ...
deleting will possibly have the same behaviour as deleting a dsp object
...
> I've almost finished my work of redesigning the garray/array business
> (to unify it with arrays in "structs") and hope to check it in
> today...
i'm curious to see it ...
cheers ... tim
--
mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space
would say "I want to see the manager."
William S. Burroughs
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list