garrays in dsp (was Re: [PD-dev] re: branch convergence)

Tim Blechmann TimBlechmann at gmx.net
Mon Nov 29 01:21:48 CET 2004


> Well, it might be simpler to store a pointer to the t_array instead of
> one to the actual vector (a_vec) in the DSP routines.  That way,
yes, but it would break the compatibility with garray_getfloatarray

> resizing or swapping vectors could happen without re-sorting DSP, but
> you'd still have to re-sort ig a "t_garray" got deleted or renamed. 
hm ... i haven't checked, what happens if a t_garray will be renamed ...
deleting will possibly have the same behaviour as deleting a dsp object
...

> I've almost finished my work of redesigning the garray/array business
> (to unify it with arrays in "structs") and hope to check it in
> today...
i'm curious to see it ...

cheers ... tim

-- 
mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de    ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk

After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space 
would say "I want to see the manager."
				      William S. Burroughs




More information about the Pd-dev mailing list