[PD-dev] PD patches in XML
Georg Holzmann
grhPD at gmx.at
Wed Dec 15 17:51:00 CET 2004
Hallo!
> <nbx ID="nbx1"/>
> <obj ID="obj1">print
> <connect>
> <from ID="nbx1"/>
> </connect>
> </obj>
But in this bottom-up approach the number box of this example must be
created before the print ! (as we spoke about yeterday)
So you can't simple put the objects on the empty canvas and then connect
them (of course you can do that too, but i think this is more complicated ?)
> <connect inlet="3">
> <from ID="obj1" outlet="1">
> <from ID="obj2" outlet="0">
> </connect>
> looks somewhat ok to me (although i am not sure whether it is bad style
> to have an "ID"-argument that is a reference rather than the id of the
> connection.
what about name ? :
<connect inlet="3">
<from name="obj1" outlet="1">
<from name="obj2" outlet="0">
</connect>
> and this reminds me, that probably connections really should have an id,
> so you could e.g. delete them directly (like "dyn")
like this:
<nbx ID="nbx1"/>
<obj ID="obj1">print
<connect ID="blabla" inlet="0">
<from ID="nbx1" outlet="0"/>
</connect>
</obj>
but which advantages has this approach? You could also go to the object
and delete the connection (and in the bottom-up style the object would
be the one under the connection).
And if you give labels to the connections you also have to remeber these
if you are writing a patch in an editor (so that you don't use one label
multiple times).
LG
Georg
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list