[PD-dev] Catchier name for the development branch ?

Tim Blechmann TimBlechmann at gmx.net
Tue May 3 19:18:50 CEST 2005

> > i think before thinking about a name, we should think about the
> > future  of the development branch...
> Ok, what are your concerns vis-à-vis the development branch ?
i don't like the idea of spending a lot of time with reinventing wheels
... the console was one example ... you invented one and miller invented
one ...
also, i'm not supporting the threaded soundfiler any more due to the
missing array locking, that i don't want to rewrite for each new
instance of stable_ ... basically, i'm waiting until miller introduces
some functionality for this until i start working on a clean version
again ...

> I ask this because I'm resuming work on ImpureData right now, and 
> there's not going to be an "impd_0_38" branch. What does it mean to
> you and everybody else on the devel branch ?
it's cool that you are planning to resume your works on impd ... i hope,
you'll work on devel, when working on that ...
but i'd suggest, we discuss about the specific issues ... maybe having a
devel_ developer meeting on irc ;-)

cheers ... t

mailto:TimBlechmann at gmx.de    ICQ: 96771783

latest mp3: kMW.mp3

latest cd: Goh Lee Kwang & Tim Blechmann: Drone

After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space 
would say "I want to see the manager."
				      William S. Burroughs

More information about the Pd-dev mailing list