[PD-dev] Tcl/Tk versions since 8.4.4 on Mac OSX?

[Miller Puckette]

Yes, I forgot all about it!  And I don't know why I didn't want the jack part
(possibly because I knew I couldn't test it at the time), but have gone
agead and put it in now.  I'm currently having other difficulties (portaudio
V19 transition) but once I get a test tone out I'll commit to CVS...

cheers
Miller

On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:32:03PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> You already included the fix related to that problem, its in CVS, so  
> that should work fine. But I am curious why you omitted the Jack/OSX  
> fixes that were part of that patch.  They are necessary in order to be  
> able to compile Pd.app releases that have Jack support, unless you have  
> found another way that's not in CVS yet.
> 
> .hc
> 
> On Jul 14, 2005, at 3:38 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> 
> >Aha, now I found it... it's patch 1204294 from Hans-Christoph,
> >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
> >func=detail&aid=1204294&group_id=55736&atid=478072
> >
> >thanks
> >Miller
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:28:03PM -0400, james tittle wrote:
> >>hi miller,
> >>
> >>On Jul 14, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> >>>
> >>>I thought I saw someone had figured out how to fix the wierd problem
> >>>with newer-than-8.4.4 versions of Tcl/Tk on OSX (you click on the
> >>>app and
> >>>Tcl/Tk dies with an error, whereas running Pd.app/Contents/
> >>>Resources/bin/pd
> >>>works fine...)
> >>
> >>>But madly searching through the list archives I can't find it... am
> >>>I dreaming?
> >>
> >>
> >>...this sounds kinda familiar, but I can say that over the last few
> >>days (on OSX 10.4.1) I've not had any problems with tcl/tk 8.4.9.1
> >>compiling and running the cvs head of pd (devel included)...the
> >>latest version is 8.4.10, but that introduces a change
> >>
> >>
> >>>Also, James found out that dynamic loading is now best done using
> >>>dlopen()
> >>>etc.. unlsee there's something wrong with that I'll stick it in.
> >>
> >>...outside of the initial work I did on this, I haven't revisited
> >>it...there really doesn't seem to be a problem if externals are built
> >>in two_level_namespace (ie. NOT flat_namespace), but I haven't tried
> >>this out with all externals in cvs...I'll keep ya posted as I try
> >>things out...in any event, like the patch says, dlopen is the
> >>preferred way for sometime on osx, and we didn't know... :-\
> >>
> >>james
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >PD-dev mailing list
> >PD-dev at iem.at
> >http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
> >
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________ 
> ____
> 
> 
> "Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is  
> related to the telescope."
>                                                                          
>                                -Edsger Dykstra