[PD-dev] First attempt at "list" object uploaded

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Jul 25, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Hallo,
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> and since there are some parallels between message-$-args and
>> object-$-args, having a "$@" would also mean that you could have
>> argument-lists of arbitrary length in abstractions in abstractions.
>> [l $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] is not the same as [l $@].
>
> Now *THAT* would be mighty cool. I'm quite fond of IEM's [dollarg]
> already.

Yes, this would be really good.  It would be nice to have that  
flexibility.  It would make it much easier to build more complicated  
objects in Pd.

.hc

________________________________________________________________________ 
____

"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of  
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an  
idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps  
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the  
possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of  
it."
                                                                          
          - Thomas Jefferson