[PD-dev] data "fields" - pure enough?
matju at artengine.ca
Mon Oct 10 02:09:11 CEST 2005
Btw I didn't receive Frank's reply, so I'm pasting it from the pd-dev
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > > a) let w only go from 0 to 100 and
> > > b) let w be displayed as going from 0 px to 38 px.
> > > What is still missing here is an alternate way to display w: scaled,
> > > but *without* restricting w to the range 0 to 100.
> > it could use (0:) as meaning w>=0, (:0) as meaning w<=0, and (:) as
> > meaning no restriction.
> Not quite: You would not know how to scale, as there is no input range
D'oh. Sorry. it's true that the current notation doesn't lend itself to
specifying scale factors without ranges, as all scale factors are
computed from a pair of ranges. Well, there's not much of a choice but to
invent a new syntax for scale factors.
Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-dev