[PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Wed Nov 23 07:10:46 CET 2005


On Nov 22, 2005, at 11:39 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> What about alt_0x3c0x3c0x3c_setup()?  That would highlight that its an
>
> but this really makes and object called [alt_0x3c0x3c0x3c] impossible!

The setup function would then be alt_alt_0x3c0x3c0x3c_setup(), so it  
would be possible.

>> alternate name, rather than just having an seemingly arbitrary  
>> reversal  of the "setup" placement.  And the function is called   
>> sys_load_lib_alt().  That makes more sense in terms of the API.
>
> well calling it sys_load_lib_alt() was a very fast decision (so i am  
> not proud of it).
> i still think that the alternative setup function should be called  
> fundamentally differently, so that it is impossible to make an object  
> with a normal setup-function that is named like the alternative  
> function of another object.

How about sys_load_lib_hex() and hex_blahblah_setup()

> but probably it would be nice to hear somebody else's opinion on this  
> (at least from those who are not entirely bored of this thread)

Definitely!

.hc

>
> mfg.ads.r
> IOhannes
>

________________________________________________________________________ 
____

            "The arc of history bends towards justice."
                                            - Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.





More information about the Pd-dev mailing list