[PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Wed Nov 23 07:10:46 CET 2005
On Nov 22, 2005, at 11:39 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> What about alt_0x3c0x3c0x3c_setup()? That would highlight that its an
>
> but this really makes and object called [alt_0x3c0x3c0x3c] impossible!
The setup function would then be alt_alt_0x3c0x3c0x3c_setup(), so it
would be possible.
>> alternate name, rather than just having an seemingly arbitrary
>> reversal of the "setup" placement. And the function is called
>> sys_load_lib_alt(). That makes more sense in terms of the API.
>
> well calling it sys_load_lib_alt() was a very fast decision (so i am
> not proud of it).
> i still think that the alternative setup function should be called
> fundamentally differently, so that it is impossible to make an object
> with a normal setup-function that is named like the alternative
> function of another object.
How about sys_load_lib_hex() and hex_blahblah_setup()
> but probably it would be nice to hear somebody else's opinion on this
> (at least from those who are not entirely bored of this thread)
Definitely!
.hc
>
> mfg.ads.r
> IOhannes
>
________________________________________________________________________
____
"The arc of history bends towards justice."
- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list