[PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report

[geiger]

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> günter geiger wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >
> >>but probably it would be nice to hear somebody else's opinion on this
> >>(at least from those who are not entirely bored of this thread)
> >
> >
> > Not an opinion,but an alternative proposal would be to use something
> > non-numeric instead of 0x, like "$" for example.
> >
>
> looking into kernighan-ritchie it says (if i read the c-syntax-graph
> correctly) that the function-name is an identifier which in turn has to
> match the regular expression "[_A-Za-z]{[_A-Za-z0-9]}*" (transcription
> to regex done by me, so it might be erroneous)
>
> it doesn't say anything about non-alphanumeric characters (except for
> the underscore), so i am a bit afraid of that.

Well, a bad example then, what about "x0" instead of "0x", or whatever
doesnt start as a numeric value.

Günter

>
>
> mfg.adr
> IOhannes
>