[PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Wed Nov 23 17:50:22 CET 2005
On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> geiger wrote:
>
>>> it doesn't say anything about non-alphanumeric characters (except for
>>> the underscore), so i am a bit afraid of that.
>> Well, a bad example then, what about "x0" instead of "0x", or whatever
>> doesnt start as a numeric value.
>
> nice idea. (but wouldn't that be even more confusing than having an
> arbitrary prefix?)
>
> probably it would be easiest to just prepend "_" and keep the 0x
> notation.
Yes, that sounds good. So then you couldn't have an object named _0x2a
for example. I think that is a livable comprimise.
.hc
________________________________________________________________________
____
"Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope."
-Edsger
Dykstra
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list