[PD-dev] loaderHEX bug report

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at eds.org
Wed Nov 23 17:50:22 CET 2005


On Nov 23, 2005, at 10:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> geiger wrote:
>
>>> it doesn't say anything about non-alphanumeric characters (except for
>>> the underscore), so i am a bit afraid of that.
>> Well, a bad example then, what about "x0" instead of "0x", or whatever
>> doesnt start as a numeric value.
>
> nice idea. (but wouldn't that be even more confusing than having an  
> arbitrary prefix?)
>
> probably it would be easiest to just prepend "_" and keep the 0x  
> notation.

Yes, that sounds good.  So then you couldn't have an object named _0x2a  
for example.  I think that is a livable comprimise.

.hc
________________________________________________________________________ 
____

"Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is  
related to the telescope."
                                                           -Edsger  
Dykstra





More information about the Pd-dev mailing list