[PD-dev] compiler optimizations and TclTk
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Tue Nov 29 06:46:33 CET 2005
On Nov 28, 2005, at 6:12 PM, carmen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:35:30PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone ever done any profiling to see whether it makes any
>> difference if you compile TclTk with the CPU compiler flags?
>
> switching to 8.5 did seem to help a decent amount, more so than any
> optimilization flags.. kind of like the sIMD additions to devel helps
> much more than slopping on a bunch of -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer gunk.
> but youre welcome to play funroll-loops and let us know what you find
> :)
Yes, I can imagine that SIMD stuff would help. Have you run into any
bugs with 8.5?
>> One of
>> the next steps is to make a global OPTIM_FLAGS variable, so that the
>
> the last 'pd wont compile' to this list was actually caused by
> aggressive optimization flags coupled with redhat's screwy compilers..
Yeah, this would just be for personal gratification. The default would
be conservative.
.hc
>
>> whole package can be built for a certain CPU. I wonder whether TclTk
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
________________________________________________________________________
____
"Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope."
-Edsger
Dykstra
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list