[PD-dev] RRADical moving to 0.39!

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Sounds good to me, I am glad that you are working on it again.

As for the "archive" version, just tag the last 0.38 compatible version  
in CVS, then its easy to checkout.

Also, it would be great if you check out the rradical that's part of  
the current Pd-extended.  I'd love to be able to use it "out of box"  
with the Pd-extended installers.

.hc

On Dec 1, 2005, at 7:32 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:

> Hi,
>
> this is just a warning message: I'm about to finally do a radical
> change of RRADical in probably the next two weeks, that is, the move
> to 0.39.
>
> That means, all future versions of RRADical will absoluetly require Pd
> in a version >= 0.39. All Pd packages which still are based on 0.38
> will then not be able to use the CVS-HEAD of RRADical!
>
> Background is, that I want to use the new way of GOP and a lot of
> [list] stuff.
>
> I'm open for suggestions on how to create an "archive" of the old
> patches. As I also want to move all RRADical patches except
> core-memento to a single directory, I guess I will just tag the
> current state once, and then go crazy.
>
> So, please consider any support for RRADical on 0.38 stopping at this
> point.
>
> Ciao
> --  
>  Frank Barknecht                 _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev at iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>

________________________________________________________________________ 
____

Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to  
realize his wishes.
Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish.
		                                                -William Carlos  
Williams