[PD-dev] -Wall
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Fri Dec 2 19:54:29 CET 2005
On Dec 2, 2005, at 4:46 AM, David Plans Casal wrote:
>
> On 2 Dec 2005, at 09:32, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> On Dec 1, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>>>> If there is a majority then there has to be a population. If
>>>> there's a
>>>> population then there has to be a list of the electorate. So, who's
>>>> allowed to vote and who's not?
>>> Yes, we do need to define a collective decision process. But for
>>> such things,
>>> just a consensus of the pd-dev list has worked pretty well, i.e.
>>> post your
>>> suggested changes, and wait for some responses.
>>
>> What if there is no response?
>
> In the ASF, that's called 'lazy consensus'. You propose, wait for
> responses, and it in the absence of any, it is understood that you
> should just go ahead an JFDI.
Yeah, as long as you give it a few days. We can't all always be
reading the list everyday.
.hc
>
> d
>
> --
> David Plans Casal
> Researcher, UEA Studios
> d.casal at uea dot ac dot uk
> http://www.davidcasal.com
>
________________________________________________________________________
____
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
- Eldridge Cleaver
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list