[PD-dev] help me with my DLL snafu

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

geiger wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Miller Puckette wrote:
> 
>>OK, I'm liking "pd_win32" more and more.  If Microsoft makes a new dll
>>format that permits bundling, that would be a good moment to change the
>>suffix again...

pwersonally i would prefer "w32" instead of "win32", just to get rid of 
the competitive attitude ;-)

> 
> 
> Which leads me to a question I always wanted to ask, but never dared to.
> What should be done on platforms that support more than one architecture,
> like linux or macosx ?
> Obvioulsy a xxx.pd_linux from a powerpc machine is not usable on a
> pentium, which makes bundling impossible. One would need a
> pd_linux_368, pd_linux_ppc, etc ...

true. i noticed very similar problems on my amd64 which is mostly use 
with 64bit linux but sometimes with the 32bit version of the same os.
obviously i have xxx.pd_linux which cannot be opened by the 
"architecture" i am currently working on so i have to recompile.

mfg.asd.r
IOhannes