[PD-dev] PureUnity now includes an "external"
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sat Jan 7 07:15:43 CET 2006
On Jan 6, 2006, at 10:45 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On Jan 5, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>>> If the buildsystem extends to /abstractions/ then what is the point
>>> of
>>> keeping /externals/ and /abstractions/ separated? (apart from
>>> inertia...)
>> I am open to suggestions how to best organize this, but I think for
>> compiled
>> objects, organizing around compilation system makes the most sense.
>
> I suppose that you do it because it makes sense, else it wouldn't make
> sense. However, I'd like to know _why_ it makes sense, which is the
> question I was trying to imply when asking the aforementioned question
> at
> 10:36 PM.
Because when you mix up files of different types, it makes the pattern
matching rules more complicated. I am sure there are other reasons as
well, that's the first that comes to mind. It seems to be a standard
practice, and its always a good idea to follow standard practice unless
you have a good reason not to do so.
>> But Pd objects could really go anywhere.
>
> BTW there's /xgui/ /Framestein/ /supercollider/ ... why are those dirs
> where they are?
Because someone stuck them there a long time ago. No better reason
than that. /extensions/ would be a good place for xgui, Framestein is
defunct, so it doesn't matter. don't know anything about
/supercollider/.
.hc
________________________________________________________________________
____
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the
possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of
it."
- Thomas
Jefferson
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list