[PD-dev] bind abstraction-canvas to full classname
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Fri Jan 13 20:39:14 CET 2006
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I am glad the .pd issue worked out easily.
>
> I just thought of one thing. The "pd-bar.pd" compatibility binding for
> [foo/bar] might not be the best thing to have. If you had [foo/bar]
> and [bar], you would not be able to insure that you are independently
> sending messages to [bar] with the symbol "pd-bar.pd" since both
> [foo/bar] and [bar] would listen to pd-bar.pd.
>
> I vote for clean implementation over backwards compatibility. (it is
> still pd 0.* 8-)
>
i totally agree
(however, i didn't dare to do it)
i have added a note to the sf-tracker, so that whenever miller (or
someone else) considers incorporating the patch, they should give the
compatibility issue a quick thought.
removing the compatibility binding is mainly deleting 2 consecutive
lines (and modifying the 3rd), so it is fairly simple.
mfg.asdr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list