[PD-dev] bind abstraction-canvas to full classname

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> abstractions require the .pd extension. with the 2nd patch i submitted a
> ".pd" is appended to the canvas-receiver of an _abstraction_. the "new"
> (currently: additional, but see the other mails on this topic)
> canvas-receiver consists of the classname (== relative-pathname +
> filename). there is no check whether the classname (how you call the
> object) contains a relative (or even absolute) pathname.

What's the use of being able to contact one (and only one) instance of an 
abstraction via a receive-symbol?

How do I know which instance I am contacting?

And then, why is [namecanvas] marked as obsolete?

 _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada