[PD-dev] [ pure-data-Patches-1405137 ] multiple $arg-expansion

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Thomas Grill wrote:
> 
> Am 13.01.2006 um 20:40 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
> 
>> now that is most likely even cooler than the 
>> abstraction-classname-binding...
>>
>> please do some testing...
> 
> 
> Today, when doing a workshop with some pd newcomers i was once more 
> embarassed about the tricks i needed to use $0 inside a message. Since 
> $0 is special anyway, is there a real reason for it?
> 

do you mean, is there a reason for my patch, a reason for $0 or a reason 
for $0 being "different" in messages?

mfg.ad.r
IOhannes