[PD-dev] under_scores versus studlyCaps in object names
carmen
ix at replic.net
Sun Mar 26 06:08:28 CEST 2006
On Sat Mar 25, 2006 at 09:45:52PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> I just was thinking: C++, Java, SuperCollider, Python, SmallTalk,
> processing, etc. all use studlyCaps as the standard for object and
> method names rather than the GNU C under_score_object_names or the
> Max/Pd-style runeverythingtogether (natural for German and Thai
> speakers, but not most languages AFAIK).
i think its called camelCase in some circles. no idea why, as i can't read Arabic..
pd symbols can have spaces, so do we even need underscores? i find eather solution incongruous and not idiomatic with pd
>
> Should we make the new Pd libraries use capsAsTheStandardNameFormat?
> I am beginning to think yes...
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list