[PD-dev] "object" lib

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Apr 6, 2006, at 11:13 PM, carmen wrote:

>> Would you like to elaborate on that?
>
>
> i'd just rather not see a bunch of workaround hacks packaged with  
> the 'object' prefix, i think it should be reserved for something  
> builtin. for an example of this, see Ruby's "Object" object..

> diagram of the day: http://rhg.rubyforge.org/images/ 
> ch_object_classtree.png

Pd is not an object-oriented programming language, so a classtree is  
totally irrelevant.  There is no inheritance whatsoever, for example.

I don't think that Pd should have inheritance, its a totally  
paradigm.  We should think of it that way.  Its as Object-Oriented as  
any procedural language.

.hc



________________________________________________________________________ 
____

News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is  
publicity.
                                                                         
                       - Bill Moyers