[PD-dev] "object" lib

[David Plans Casal]

On 7 Apr 2006, at 04:13, carmen wrote:

>> Would you like to elaborate on that?
>
> i'd just rather not see a bunch of workaround hacks packaged with  
> the 'object' prefix, i think it should be reserved for something  
> builtin. for an example of this, see Ruby's "Object" object..

Not that I can call myself an expert in OO, but I have to say PD is  
just dataflow, nothing OO about it, so the keyword object being  
reserved is pre-empting something irrelevant IMO.

d