[PD-dev] Anyone have a quick hack of OSCx that is "settable"?

[Martin Peach]

B. Bogart wrote:

>Hey all,
>
>Has anyone took a crack of making OSCx settable via message? Any quick
>experiment is fine for now.
>  
>
What do you mean?

I'm working on splitting the OSC from the transport right now. I now 
have a udpsend, udpreceive, tcpsend and tcpreceive objects that use 
lists of bytes (in pd they are floats on [0..255]) instead of pd messages.
I also did the packOSC object that constructs an OSC packet from a pd 
list, but it's still tied up with LIBOSC. The unpackOSC is still not 
started...

Martin

>otherwise I'll have to drop OSC for my multi-screen syncing.
>
>Thanks,
>.b.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>PD-dev mailing list
>PD-dev at iem.at
>http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: udpsend_test.pd
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20060419/e57c61a1/attachment.asc>