[PD-dev] Going from CVS to Subversion

[Tim Blechmann]

> > i am all for it, but: does sourceforge already implement some kind of
> > acl for svn? or can we live without acl's?
> 
> According to the Site Docs, "no means is provided to limit access to a
> repository on a per-path basis" for Subversion. This seems to be
> planned, but as we know Sourceforge, one shouldn't hold his/her
> breath.

well, the pd repository doesn't need to be located at sourceforge ... i
mean, the plone site is located on an iem server, so, if someone takes
the work of converting a cvs repository to a subversion, why not move
the repository server?
currently two features of sf are used ... the cvs and the tracker ...
imo, it wouldn't be a bad idea, to put the svn server as well as a
decent bug tracker (bugzilla/mantis/whatever) onto the puredata.info
server and abandon sourceforge ...
not sure, if the iem / the puredata.info server has enough resources,
but at least no one would complain about sourceforge any more :)

tim

--
tim at klingt.org    ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk

You can play a shoestring if you're sincere
  John Coltrane
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/attachments/20060813/45d95e82/attachment.pgp>