[PD-dev] configuration : .pdrc, preference dialog... s-lang
Mathieu Bouchard
matju at artengine.ca
Tue Aug 15 09:08:53 CEST 2006
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
> I would like to know where the configuration system of pd is heading to.
> I have read many months ago that the ~/.pdrc was deprecated....
in DesireData, ~/.pdrc is not deprecated, and there's an editor for it.
(the first release of DesireData is approaching quickly)
> I like that system, even though it is not possible to include comments
> in it.
devel_0_39 allows inclusion of comments.
(however, the DesireData editor strips comments and sort the options
in the order that they are in the editor)
> Maybe a system that would be nice to migrate to is the
> http://www.jedsoft.org/slang/ interpreter, which is somewhat similar to
> a simplified C syntax.
I don't know which part of pd you want to migrate this to. If it's about
the configuration system, I'm thinking about using pd messages for
everything, in the future.
Simplified C syntax is only interesting to those who are C programmers.
For pd users, it's better to use pd patches. For other people... tastes
vary. I prefer Tcl syntax.
Slang is seldom used. I don't remember any feature of Slang that made it
seem like an interesting language. Tcl is already much more used and
exciting.
> I know there are many languages like this one (namely Lua, processing,
> etc.) but this one looks nice.
What makes Lua and Processing looking not nice?
> For those that like the console to write software,
Do you want to make a console version of pd? =)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
More information about the Pd-dev
mailing list